Notes Repository (AUSL 2002-2006; Narratives; Political Law)

Constitutional Law II, Political Review [SY 2005-2006, Dean Mariano Magsalin Jr.]

These narratives were part of the content of “Notes in Constitutional Law II based on Dean Magsalin’s 2004-2005 syllabus” (2005; referred as “NCL2,” hereafter). There are a total of 472 case narratives in the linked documents.

The foreword in said compilation provided, in part:

xxx

This work was created as Berne’s personal notes for Constitutional Law II, during the summer of 2005, in anticipation of the reading requirements for the second part of Political Law Review. The facts in the cases were deliberately longer than standard digests to allow a semi-detailed and chronological statement of facts, allowing in turn, a better understanding of the circumstances antecedent to the cases.

This work is shared to Arellano University School of Law students to allow those who do not have the luxury of time to completely read the full text of the cases assigned with an alternative source of materials to comply with the minimum requirements to prepare in class. The efforts aimed to aid co-students in their studies should not be a signal for students’ laxity in their studies. This work is designed as a suppletory, not a primary, material for studies involving the Bill of Rights. Students are encouraged to read the original text of the cases and the books of various authorities tackling the subject matter, for proper guidance. Students are further encouraged to create their own notes to develop their own methods of synthesis of the assigned readings.

xxx

I. General Considerations (PDF, 128.7 KB; NCL2, pp. 3-4)

II. Powers of the State

III. Bill of Rights

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-General Considerations include the following case: (1) PBM Employees Organization v. Philippine Blooming Mills (PBM) [GR L-31195, 5 June 1973]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Police Power include the following cases: (1) Lozano v. Martinez [GR L-63419, 18 December 1986]; (2) Del Rosario v. Bengzon [GR 88265, 21 December 1989]; (3) Tablarin v. Gutierrez (J) [GR 78164, 31 July 1987]; (4) Ermita Malate Hotel & Motel Operators Association v. City of Manila [GR L-24693, 31 July 1967]; (5) Sangalang v. IAC [GR 71169, 25 August 1989]; (6) Villanueva v. Castaneda [GR L-61311, 21 September 1987]; (7) De la Cruz v. Paras [GR L-42571-72, 25 July 1983]; (8) Velasco v. Villegas [GR L-24153, 14 February 1983]; (9) Magtajas v. Pryce Properties Corp. [GR 111097, 20 July 1994]; (10) Tano v. Socrates [GR 110249, 21 August 1997]; (11) Bautista v. Juinio [GR L-50908, 31 January 1984]; (12) Taxicab Operators v. The Board of Transportation [GR L-59234, 30 September 1982]; (13) Anglo-Fil Trading v. Lazaro [GR L-54958, 2 September 1983]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Power of Eminent Domain include the following cases: (1) City of Manila v. Chinese Community of Manila [GR14355, 31 October 1919]; (2) Moday vs. Court of Appeals [GR 107916, 20 February 1997]; (3) Republic vs. Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. [GR L-18841, 27 January 1969]; (4) Barangay San Roque v. Heirs of Pastor [GR 138896, 20 June 2000]; (5) Republic vs. Vda. de Castellvi [GR L-20620, 15 August 1974]; (6) City Government of Quezon City vs. Ericta [GR L-34915, 24 June 1983]; (7) People vs. Fajardo [GR L-12172, 29 August 1958]; (8) National Power Corporation vs. Gutierrez [GR 60077, 18 January 1991]; (9) United States vs. Causby [328 US 256, 27 May 1946]; (10) Filstream International Inc. [GR 125218 and GR 128077. 23 January 1998]; (11) Estate or Heirs of the late ex-Justice Jose B. L. Reyes vs. City of Manila [GR 132431, 13 February 2004]; (12) City of Mandaluyong vs. Aguilar [GR 137152, 29 January 2001]; (13) Heirs of Juancho Ardona vs. Reyes [GR L-60549, 60553 to 60555; 26 October 1983]; (14) Sumulong vs. Guerrero [GR L-48685, 30 September 1987]; (15) Province of Camarines Sur vs. Court of Appeals [GR 103125, 17 May 1993]; (16) Manosca vs. Court of Appeals [GR 106440, 29 January 1996]; (17) Estate of Salud Jimenez vs. Philippine Export Processing Zone [GR 137285, 16 January 2001]; (18) Municipality of Meycauayan vs. Intermediate Appellate Court [GR L-72126, 29 January 1988]; (19) De Knecht vs. Bautista [GR L-51078, 30 October 1980]; (20) Republic vs. de Knecht [GR 87335, 12 February 1990]; (21) Philippine Press Institute vs. Commission on Elections [GR 119694, 22 May 1995]; (22) National Housing Authority vs. Heirs f Isidro Guivelondo [GR 154411, 19 June 2003]; (23) Eslaban vs. Vda. de Onorio [GR 146062, 28 June 2001]; (24) Republic vs. Intermediate Appellate Court [GR 71176, 21 May 1990]; (25) City of Cebu vs. Dedamo [GR 142971, 7 May 2002]; (26) Export Processing Zone Authority vs. Dulay [GR L-59603, 29 April 1987]; (27) Ansaldo vs. Tantuico [GR 50147, 3 August 1990]; (28) National Power Corporation vs. Court of Appeals [GR 107631, 26 February 1996]; (29) Association of Small Landowners in the Philippines Inc. vs. Secretary of Agrarian Reform [GR 78741, 14 July 1989]; (30) Department of Agrarian Reform vs. Court of Appeals [GR 118745, 6 October 1995]; (31) Manila Electric Company (MERALCO) vs. Pineda [GR 59791, 13 February 1992]; (32) National Power Corporation vs. Henson [GR 129998, 29 December 1998]; (33) National Power Corporation vs. Angas [GR 60225-26, 8 May 1992]; (34) Republic of the Philippines vs. Salem Investment Corporation [GR 137569, 23 June 2000]; (35) City of Manila, vs. Serrano [GR 142304, 20 June 2001]; (36) City of Baguio vs. National Waterworks and Sewerage Authority [GR L-12032, 31 August 1959]; (37) Province of Zamboanga del Norte v. City of Zamboanga [G.R. No. L-24440. March 28, 1968.]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Taxation Power include the following cases: (1) Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Algue [GR L-28896, 17 February 1988]; (2) Commissioner of Customs v. Makasiar [GR 79307, 29 August 1989]; (3) YMCA v. Collector of Internal Revenue [GR 7988, 19 January 1916]; (4) Bishop of Nueva Segovia v. Provincial Board, Ilocos Norte [GR 27588, 31 December 1927]; (5) Lladoc v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue [GR L-19201, 16 June 1965]; (6) Abra v. Hernando [GR L-49336, 31 August 1981]; (7) Abra Valley College v. Aquino [GR L-39086, 15 June 1988]; (8) American Bible Society v. City of Manila [GR L-9637, 30 April 1957]; (9) Punsalan v. Municipal Board of Manila [GR L-4817, 26 May 1954]; (10) Physical Therapy Organization v. Municipal Board of Manila [GR L-10448, 30 August 1957]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Due Process include the following cases: (1) Hurtado vs. People of State of California [110 U.S. 516, 3 March 1884]; (2) Villegas v. Hiu Chiong Tsai Pao Ho [GR L-29646, 10 Nov 1978]; (3) Rubi, et. al. vs. Provincial Board of Mindoro [GR 14078, 7 March 1919]; (4) Ople v. Torres [ GR 127685, 23 July 1998 ]; (5) Lawrence and Garner vs. Texas [539 US 558, 26 June 2003]; (6) Estrada v. Sandiganbayan [GR 148560, 19 November 2001]; (7) Tanada v. Tuvera [ GR L-63915, 29 December 1986]; (8) Philippine International Trading Corp. (PITC) v. Angeles [GR 108461, 21 October 1996]; (9) Pilipinas Kao v. CA [GR 105014, 18 December 2001]; (10) Republic vs. Express Telecommunications Co. Inc. (Extelcom) [GR 147096, 15 January 2002]; (11) Tanada v. Philippine Atomic Energy Commission [GR 70632, 11 February 1986]; (12) Anzaldo v. Clave [GR L-54597, 15 December 1982]; (13) Tumey vs. Ohio [273 US 510, 7 March 1927]; (14) People v. CA [GR 118882, 26 September 1996]; (15) Tabuena v. Sandiganbayan [GR 103501-03, 17 February 1997]; (16) People v. Medenilla [GR 131638-39, 26 March 2001]; (17) ebb v. de Leon [GR 121234, 23 August 1995]; (18) People v. Sanchez [GR 121039-45, 18 October 2001]; (19) Summary Dismissal Board v. Torcita [GR 130442, 6 April 2000]; (20) Justice Secretary v. Lantion [GR 139465, 17 October 2000]; (21) People v. Estrada [GR 130487, 19 June 2000]; (22) Lim vs. Court of Appeals [GR 111397, 12 August 2002]; (23) Rodriguez vs. Court of Appeals [GR 134278, 7 August 2002]; (24) Roxas vs. Vasquez [GR 114944, 19 June 2001]; (25) Philcomsat v. Alcuaz [GR 84818, 18 December 1989]; (26) Suntay v. People [GR L-9430, 29 June 1957]; (27) De Bisschop v. Galang [GR 18365, 31 May 1963]; (28) Var-Orient Shipping v. Achacoso [GR L-81805, 31 May 1988]; (29) Ang Tibay v. CIR [GR 46496, 27 February 1940]; (30) Montemayor v. Araneta University [GR L-44251, 31 May 1977]; (31) Meralco vs. PSC [GR L-13638-40, 30 June 1964]; (32) Ateneo v. CA [GR L-56180, 16 October 1986]; (33) Alcuaz v. PSBA [GR 76353, 2 May 1988]; (34) Non v. Dames [GR 89317, 20 May 1990]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Equal Protection include the following cases: (1) PASEI [Philippine Association of Service Exporters Inc] v. Drilon [GR L-81958, 30 June 1988]; (2) Sison v. Ancheta [GR L-59431, 25 July 1984]; (3) People v. Hernandez [GR L-6025-26, 18 July 1956]; (4) People v. Isinain [GR L-2857, 28 February 1950]; (5) Chavez v. PCGG [GR 130716, 9 December 1998]; (6) Nunez v. Sandiganbayan [GR L-50581-50617, 30 January 1982]; (7) Lacson v. Executive Secretary [GR 128096, 20 January 1999]; (8) Soriano v. Court of Appeals [GR 123936, 4 March 1999]; (9) UNIDO v. Comelec [GR 56515, 3 April 1981]; (10) Ceniza v. Comelec [GR L-52304, 28 January 1980]; (11) Philippine Judges Association [GR 105371, 11 November 1993]; (12) Olivarez v. Sandiganbayan [GR 118533, 4 October 1995]; (13) Tiu v. Court of Appeals [GR 127410, 20 January 1999]; (14) International School Alliance of Educators (ISAE) vs. Quisumbing [GR 128845, 1 June 2000]; (15) Philippine Rural Electric Cooperative Association Inc. (PHILRECA), et. al. vs. Secretary of Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) [GR 143076, 10 June 2003]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Non-impairment of Contracts include the following cases: (1) Rutter v. Esteban [GR L-3708, 18 May 1953]; (2) Ortigas v. Feati [GR L-24670, 14 December 1979]; (3) Villanueva v. Castaneda [GR L-61311, 21 September 1987]; (4) Sangalang v. Intermediate Appellate Court (IAC) [GR 71169, 22 December 1988]; (5) Ortigas v. Court of Appeals [GR 126102, 4 December 2000]; (6) Abella v. NLRC [GR 71813, 20 July 1987]; (7) Tiro v. Hontanosas [GR L-32312, 25 November 1983]; (8) Caleon v. Agus Development Corp. [GR 77365, 7 April 1992]; (9) Meralco v. Laguna [GR 131359, 5 May 1999]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Search and Seizure/Arrests include the following cases: (1) Alvero vs. Dizon [GR L-342, 4 May 1946]; (2) People vs. Andre Marti [GR 81561, 18 January 1991]; (3) Bache & Co. (Phil.) Inc. vs. Ruiz [GR L-32409, 27 February 1971]; (4) Stonehill vs. Diokno [GR L-19550, 19 June 1967]; (5) Zurcher vs. Stanford Daily [436 US 547, 31 May 1978]; (6) Wilson vs. Layne [526 US 603, 24 May 1999]; (7) Burgos v. Chief of Staff, AFP [GR 64261, 26 December 1984]; (8) Chandler vs. Miller [520 US 305, 15 April 1997]; (9) People vs. Chua Ho San [GR 128222, 17 June 1999]; (10) People vs. Molina [GR 133917, 19 February 2001]; (11) Solid Triangle Sales Corp. vs. Sitchon [GR 144309, 23 November 2001]; (12) People vs. Salanguit [GR 133254-55, 19 April 2001]; (13) Amarga vs. Abbas [GR L-8666, 28 March 1956]; (14) Sta. Rosa Mining Company vs. Assistant Provincial Fiscal Zabala [GR L-44723, 31 August 1987]; (15) People vs. Inting [GR 88919, 25 July 1990]; (16) Paderanga vs. Drilon [GR 96080, 19 April 1991]; (17) Pita vs. Court of Appeals [GR 80806, 5 October 1989]; (18) Abdula vs. Guiani [GR 118821, 18 February 2000]; (19) Pasion Vda. de Garcia vs. Locsin [GR 45950, 20 June 1938]; (20) Yee Sue Koy vs. Almeda [GR 47021, 15 June 1940]; (21) Alvarez vs. Court of First Instance of Tayabas [GR 45358, 29 January 1937]; (22) Mata vs. Bayona [GR 50720, 26 March 1984]; (23) Olaez vs. People of the Philippines [GR 78347-49, 9 November 1987]; (24) Prudente vs. Dayrit [GR 82870, 14 December 1989]; (25) Chia vs. Acting Collector of Customs [GR L-43810, 26 September 1989]; (26) 20th Century Fox Film Corporation vs. Court of Appeals [GR L-76649-51, 19 August 1988]; (27) Nolasco vs. Cruz Pano [GR L-69803, 8 October 1985]; (28) Paper Industries Corporation of the Philippines vs. Asuncion [GR 122092, 19 May 1999]; (29) Yousef Al-Ghoul vs. Court of Appeals [GR 126859, 4 September 2001]; (30) People v. Omaweng [GR 99050, 2 September 1992]; (31) People vs. Correa [GR 119246, 30 January 1998]; (32) People v. Ramos [GR 85401-02, 4 June 1990]; (33) People v. Barros [GR 90640, 29 March 1994]; (34) Veroy v. Layague [GR 95630, 18 June 1992]; (35) People vs. Damaso [GR 93516, 12 August 1992]; (36) Lopez vs. Commissioner of Customs [GR L-27968, 3 December 1975]; (37) Caballes vs. Court of Appeals [GR 136292, 15 January 2002]; (38) People vs. Asis [GR 142531, 15 October 2002]; (39) People vs. Tudtud [GR 144037, 26 September 2003]; (40) Chimel vs. California [395 US 752, 23 June 1969]; (41) People vs. dela Cruz [GR 83260, 18 April 1990]; (42) People v. Kalubiran [GR 84079, 6 May 1991]; (43) People v. Malmstedt [GR 91107, 19 June 1991]; (44) Espano vs. Court of Appeals [GR 120431, 1 April 1998]; (45) People vs. Tangliben [GR L-63630, 6 April 1990]; (46) People v. Che Chun Ting [GR 130568-69, 21 March 2000]; (47) People vs. Estrella [GR 138539-40, 21 January 2003]; (48) People vs. Libnao [GR 136860, 20 January 2003]; (49) People v. Musa [GR 96177, 27 January 1993]; (50) Padilla vs. Court of Appeals [GR 121917, 12 March 1997]; (51) People vs. Valdez [GR 129296, 25 September 2000]; (52) Arizona v. Hicks [480 US 321, 3 March 1987]; (53) People vs. Compacion [GR 124442, 20 July 2001]; (54) Roldan vs. Arca [GR L-25434, 25 July 1975]; (55) Hizon vs. Court of Appeals [GR 119619, 13 December 1996]; (56) People vs. Gatward [GRs 119772-73, 7 February 1997]; (57) People vs. Johnson [GR 138881, 18 December 2000]; (58) People vs. Suzuki [GR 120670, 23 October 2003]; (59) Bureau of Customs vs. Ogario [GR 138081, 30 March 2000]; (60) Terry vs. Ohio [392 US 1, 10 June 1968]; (61) People v. Solayao [GR 119220, 20 September 1996]; (62) Manalili v. CA [GR 113447, 9 October 1997]; (63) Malacat vs. Court of Appeals [GR 123595, 12 December 1997]; (64) Florida vs. J.L. [000 US 98-1993, 28 March 2000]; (65) People vs. Balingan [GR 105834, 13 February 1995]; (66) Asuncion vs. Court of Appeals [GR 125959, 1 February 1999]; (67) Papa vs. Mago [GR L-27360, 28 February 1968]; (68) People vs. CFI Rizal, Branch IX, Quezon City [GR L-41686, 17 November 1980]; (69) Whren v. United States [517 US 806 (No. 95-5841), 10 June 1996]; (70) Arkansas vs. Sullivan [000 US 00-262, 29 May 2001]; (71) People vs. de Gracia [GR 102009-10, 6 July 1994]; (72) Valmonte vs. de Villa [GR 83988, 24 May 1990]; (73) Aniag vs. Commission on Elections [GR 104961, 7 October 1994]; (74) People vs. Escano, Usana and Lopez [GR 129756-58, 28 January 2000]; (75) Camara vs. Municipal Court of the City and Country of San Francisco [387 US 523, 5 June 1967]; (76) In RE: Umil, Umil vs. Ramos [GR 81567, 9 July 1990]; (77) People vs. Sucro [GR 93239, 18 March 1991]; (78) People vs. Doria [GR 125299, 22 January 1999]; (79) People vs. Go [GR 116001, 14 March 2001]; (80) People vs. de Guzman [GR 117952-53, 14 February 2001]; (81) People vs. Gerente [GR 95847-48, 10 March 1993]; (82) People vs. Sinoc [GR 113511-12, 1 July 1997]; (83) People vs. Baula [GR 132671, 15 November 2000]; (84) People vs. Cubcubin [GR 136267, 10 July 2001]; (85) People vs. Rodrigueza [GR 95902, 4 February 1992]; (86) Go vs. Court of Appeals [GR 101837, 11 February 1992]; (87) People vs. Calimlim [GR 123980, 30 August 2001]; (88) People vs. Enrile [GR 74189, 26 May 1993]; (89) People vs. Pasudag [GR 128822, 4 May 2001]; (90) People vs. Aminnudin [GR L-74860, 6 July 1988]; (91) People vs. Plana [GR 128285, 27 November 2001]; (92) People vs. Conde [GR 113269, 10 April 2001]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Privacy of Communications and Correspondence include the following cases: (1) Gaanan vs. Intermediate Appellate court [GR L-69809, 16 October 1986]; (2) Katz s. United States [389 US 347, 18 December 1967]; (3) Ramirez vs. Court of Appeals [GR 93833, 28 September 1995]; (4) In RE Laureta [GR 68635, 12 March 1987]; (5) People vs. Albofera [GR L-69377, 20 July 1987]; (6) Zulueta vs. Court of Appeals [GR 107383, 20 February 1996]; (7) Deano vs. Godinez [GR L-19518, 28 November 1964]; (8) Waterous Drug Corporation vs. National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) [GR 113271, 16 October 1997]; (9) Silverthorne Lumber Co. vs. United States [251 US 385, 25 January 1920]; (10) People vs. Aruta [GR 120915, 13 April 1998]; (11) People vs. Rondero [GR 125687, 9 December 1999]; (12) Aberca vs. Ver [GR L-69866, 15 April 1988]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Custodial Investigations include the following cases: (1) Miranda vs. Arizona [384 US 436, 13 June 1966]; (2) People vs. Lugod [GR 136253, 21 February 2001]; (3) People vs. Del Rosario [GR 127755, 14 April 1999]; (4) People vs. Bolanos [GR 101808, 3 July 1992]; (5) Rhode Island vs. Innis [446 US 291, 12 May 1980]; (6) People vs. Mahinay [GR 122485, 1 February 1999]; (7) People vs. Ayson [GR 85215, 7 July 1989]; (8) Office of the Court Administrator vs. Sumilang [Administrative Matter MTJ-94-989, 18 April 1997]; (9) Gamboa vs. Cruz [GR L-56291, 27 June 1988]; (10) United States vs. Wade [388 US 218, 12 June 1967]; (11) People vs. Escordial [GR 138934-35, 16 January 2002]; (12) People vs. Piedad [GR 131923, 5 December 2002]; (13) Magtoto vs. Manguera [GR L-37201-02, 3 March 1975]; (14) People vs. Page [GR L-37507, 7 June 1977]; (15) People vs. Caguioa [GR L-38975, 17 January 1980]; (16) People vs. Tampus [GR L-44690, 28 March 1980]; (17) People vs. Galit [GR 51770, 20 March 1985]; (18) People vs. Bandula [GR 89223, 27 May 1994]; (19) People vs. Quidato [GR 117401, 1 October 1998]; (20) People vs. Rous [GR 103803-04, 27 March 1995]; (21) People vs. Januario [GR 98252, 7 February 1997]; (22) People vs. Labtan [GR 127493, 8 December 1999]; (23) People vs. Samus [GR 135957-58, 17 September 2002]; (24) People vs. Gallardo [GR 113684, 25 January 2000]; (25) People vs. Barasina [GR 109993, 21 January 1994]; (26) People vs. Morial [GR 129295, 15 August 2001]; (27) People vs. Castro [GR 106583, 19 June 1997]; (28) People vs. Wong Chuen Ming [GR 112801-11, 12 April 1996]; (29) Marcelo vs. Sandiganbayan (First Division) [GR 109242, 26 January 1999]; (30) People vs. Andan [GR 116437, 3 March 1997]; (31) People vs. Endino [GR 133026, 20 February 2001]; (32) People vs. Ordono [GR 132154, 29 June 2000]; (33) People vs. Guillermo [GR 147786, 20 January 2004]; (34) People vs. Gomez [GR 101817, 26 March 1997]; (35) Illinois vs. Perkins [496 US 292, 4 June 1990]; (36) People vs. Lugod [GR 136253, 21 February 2001]; (37) People vs. Luvendino [GR 69971, 3 July 1992]; (38) People vs. Alicando [GR 117487, 12 December 1995]; (39) Harris vs. New York [401 US 222, 24 February 1971]; (40) New York vs. Quarles [467 US 649, 12 June 1984]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Bail include the following cases: (1) Herras Teehankee vs. Rovira [GR L-101, 20 December 1945]; (2) People vs. San Diego [GR L-29676, 24 December 1968]; (3) Cortes vs. Catral [AM RTJ-97-1387, 10 September 1997]; (4) Lavides vs. Court of Appeals [GR 129670, 1 February 2000]; (5) Government of the United States of America, Represented by the Philippine Department of Justice, vs. Purganan [GR 148571, 24 September 2002]; (6) Paderanga vs. Court of Appeals [GR 115407, 28 August 1995]; (7) Go vs. Bongolan [AM RTJ-99-1464, 26 July 1999]; (8) People vs. Gako [GR 135045, 15 December 2000]; (9) Marallag vs. Cloribel-Purungganan [AM 00-1529-RTJ, 9 April 2002]; (10) Enrile vs. Salazar [GR 92163, 5 June 1990]; (11) People vs. Donato [GR 79269, 5 June 1991]; (12) People vs. Fortes [GR 91155, 25 June 1993]; (13) Maguddatu vs. Court of Appeals [GR 139599, 23 February 2000]; (14) Obosa vs. Court of Appeals [GR 114350, 16 January 1997]; (15) Villasenor vs. Abano [GR L-23599, 29 September 1967]; (16) De la Camara vs. Enage [GR L-32951-2, 17 September 1971]; (17) Almeda vs. Villaluz [GR L-31665, 6 August 1975]; (18) Yap vs. Court of Appeals [GR 141529, 6 June 2001]; (19) Cabañero vs. Cañon [AM MTJ-01-1369, 20 September 2001]; (20) Manotoc vs. Court of Appeals [GR L-62100, 30 May 1986]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Rights of an Accused include the following cases: (1) People vs. Dramayo [GR L-21325, 29 October 1971]; (2) Alejandro vs. Pepito [GR L-52090, 21 February 1980]; (3) Dumlao vs. Commission on Elections [GR L-52245, 22 January 1980]; (4) People vs. Mingoa [GR L-5371, 26 March 1953]; (5) Feeder International Line PTE, Ltd. vs. Court of Appeals [GR 94262, 31 May 1991]; (6) People vs. Martos [GR 91847, 24 July 1992]; (7) Corpuz vs. People [GR 74259, 14 February 1991]; (8) Dizon-Pamintuan vs. People [GR 111426, 11 July 1994]; (9) People vs. Holgado [GR L-2809, 22 March 1950]; (10) Delgado vs. Court of Appeals [GR L-46392, 10 November 1986]; (11) People vs. Baluyot [GRs L-35752-3, 31 January 1977]; (12) People vs. Magsi [GR L-32888, 12 August 1983]; (13) People vs. Malunsing [GR L-29015, 29 April 1975]; (14) Moslares vs. Court of Appeals [GR 129744, 26 June 1998]; (15) Borja vs. Mendoza [GR L-45667, 20 June 1977]; (16) People vs. Alcalde [GR 139225-28, 29 May 2002]; (17) People vs. Dy [GR 115236-37, 29 January 2002]; (18) People vs. Sadiosa [GR 107084, 15 May 1998]; (19) People vs. Perez [GR 122764, 24 September 1998]; (20) People vs. Lozano [GR 125080, 25 September 1998]; (21) People vs. Ladrillo [GR 124342, 8 December 1999]; (22) People vs. Lumilan [GR 102706, 25 January 2000]; (23) Evangelista vs. People [GRs 10813536, 14 August 2000]; (24) People vs. Valdesancho [GR 137051-52, 30 May 2001]; (25) People vs. Alcalde [GR 139225-28, 29 May 2002]; (26) People vs. Ostia [GR 131804, 26 February 2003]; (27) People vs. Flores [GR 128823-24, 27 December 2002]; (28) Acebedo vs. Sarmiento [GR L-28025, 16 December 1970]; (29) People vs. Laya [GR L-53873, 13 May 1988]; (30) Conde vs. Rivera [GR 21741, 25 January 1924]; (31) Dacanay vs. People [GR 101302, 25 January 1995]; (32) People vs. Rivera [GR 139180, 31 July 2001]; (33) Solar Team Entertainment vs. How [GR 140863, 22 August 2000]; (34) Garcia vs. Domingo [GR L-30104, 25 July 1973]; (35) Re: Request Radio-TV Coverage of the Trial of the Plunder Cases against Estrada. Perez vs. Estrada [AM 01-4-03-SC, 29 June 2001]; (36) Tumey vs. Ohio [273 US 510, 7 March 1927]; (37) Soriano vs. Angeles [GR 109920, 31 August 2000]; (38) United States vs. Javier [GR L-12990, 21 January 1918]; (39) United States vs. Garcia [GR L-3951, 14 March 1908]; (40) People vs. Sandal [GRs 32394-95, 5 September 1930]; (41) People vs. de Luna [GR 77969, 22 June 1989]; (42) People vs. Prieto [GR L-46542, 21 July 1978]; (43) People vs. Salas [GR L-66469, 29 July 1986]; (44) Gimenez vs. Nazareno [GR L-37933, 15 April 1988]; (45) Aquino vs. Military Commission No.2 [GR L-37364, 9 May 1975]; (46) People vs. Salas [GR L-66469, 29 July 1986]; (47) Carredo vs. People [GR 77542, 19 March 1990]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Right against Self-Incrimination include the following cases: (1) United States vs. Tan Teng [GR 7081, 7 Septmber 1912]; (2) United States vs. Ong Siu Hong [GR 12778, 3 August 1917]; (3) People vs. Otadora [GR L-2154, 26 April 1950]; (4) Villaflor vs. Summer [GR 16444, 8 September 1920]; (5) Bermudez vs. Castillo [Per. Rec. 714-A, 26 July 1937]; (6) Beltran vs. Samson [GR 32025, 23 September 1929]; (7) People vs. Tranca [GR 110357, 17 August 1994]; (8) South Dakota vs. Neville [459 US 553, 22 February 1983]; (9) Schmerber vs. California [384 US 757, 20 June 1966]; (10) People vs. Rondero [GR 125687, 9 December 1999]; (11) People vs. Gallarde [GR 133025, 17 February 2000]; (12) Pascual vs. Board of Medical Examiners [GR L-25018, 26 May 1969]; (13) Galman vs. Pamaran [GRs 71208-09, 30 August 1985]; (14) Brown vs. Walker [161 US 591, 23 March 1896]; (15) Chavez vs. Court of Appeals [GR L-29169, 19 August 1968]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Right to Speedy Disposition of cases include the following cases: (1) Duterte vs. Sandiganbayan [GR 130191, 27 April 1998]; (2) Tatad vs. Sandiganbayan [GR L-72335-39, 21 March 1988]; (3) Abardo vs. Sandiganbayan [GR 139571-72, 28 March 2001]; (4) Lopez vs. Office of the Ombudsman [GR 140529, 6 September 2001]; (5) Licaros vs. Sandiganbayan [GR 145851, 22 November 2001]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Punishment include the following cases: (1) People vs. dela Cruz [GR L-5790, 17 April 1953]; (2) People vs. Borja [GR L-22947, 12 July 1979]; (3) Veniegas vs. People [GRs L-57601-06, 30 July 1982]; (4) People vs. Dacuycuy [GR L-45127, 5 May 1989]; (5) State of Louisiana vs. Resweber [329 US 459, 13 January 1947]; (6) Ford vs. Wainwright [477 US 399, 26 June 1986]; (7) People vs. Camano [GRs L-36662-63, 30 July 1982]; (8) Echegaray vs. Secretary of Justice [GR 132601, 19 January 1999]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Involuntary servitude include the following case: (1) In RE Habeas Corpus. Aclaraction vs. Gatmaitan [GR L-39115, 26 May 1975]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Non-imprisonment for debt include the following cases: (1) Lozano v. Martinez [GR L-63419, 18 December 1986]; (2) People vs. Linsangan [GR 43290, 21 December 1935]; (3) Sura vs. Martin [GR L-2509, 29 November 1968]; (4) People vs. Nitafan [GR 75954, 22 October 1992]; (5) In RE Habeas Corpuz of Benjamin Vergara et. al. Vergara vs. Gedorio [GR 154037, 30 April 2003]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Ex post facto laws/Bill of attainders include the following cases: (1) In RE: Declaration of the Petitioner’s Rights and Duties under Section 8 of RA 6132. Kay Villegas Kami. [GR L-32485, 22 October 1970]; (2) Mejia vs. Pamaran [GRs L-56741-42, 15 April 1988]; (3) People vs. Ferrer [GRs L-32613-14, 27 December 1972]; (4) Misolas vs. Panga [GR 83341, 30 January 1990]; (5) People vs. Sandiganbayan [GR 101724, 3 July 1992]; (6) Wright vs. CA [GR 113213, 15 August 1994]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Double Jeopardy include the following cases: (1) People vs. Obsania [GR L-24447, 29 June 1968]; (2) Melo vs. People [GR L-3580, 22 March 1950]; (3) People vs. Yorac [GR L-29270, 23 November 1971]; (4) People vs. Bocar [GR L-27935, 16 August 1985]; (5) Galman vs. Sandiganbayan [GR 72670, 12 September 1986]; (6) Flores vs. Ponce Enrile [GR L-38440, 20 July 1982]; (7) Heirs of Tito Rillorta vs. Firme [GR L-54904, 29 January 1988]; (8) People vs. Relova [GR L-45129, 6 March 1987]; (9) Perez vs. Court of Appeals [GR 80838, 29 November 1988]; (10) People vs. City Court of Manila [GR L-36528, 24 Septembe 1987]; (11) Cruz vs. Ponce-Enrile [GR L-75983, 15 April 1988]; (12) Tan vs. Barrios [GRs 85481-82, 18 October 1990]; (13) People vs. Grospe [GRs L-74053-54, 20 January 1988]; (14) People vs. Santiago [GR 80778, 20 June 1989]; (15) Que vs. Cosico [GR 81861, 8 September 1989]; (16) Caes vs. Intermediate Appellate Court [GRs 74989-90, 6 November 1989]; (17) Nierras vs. Dacuycuy [GRs 59568-76, 11 January 1990]; (18) Icasiano vs. Sandiganbayan [GR 95642, 28 May 1992]; (19) People vs. Milflores [GRs L-32144-45, 30 July 1982]; (20) People vs. Vergara [GR 101557-5, 28 April 1993]; (21) People vs. Tiozon [GR 89823, 19 June 1991]; (22) People vs. Villarama [GR 99287, 23 June 1992]; (23) Tupaz vs. Ulep [GR 127777, 1 October 1999]; (24) People vs. Sandiganbayan [GR 140633, 4 February 2002]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Writ of Habeas Corpus include the following cases: (1) Villavicencio vs. Lukban [GR 14639, 25 March 1919]; (2) Moncupa vs. Ponce-Enrile [GR L-63345, 30 January 1986]; (3) In RE Habeas Corpus of Teodosio Lansang, et. al. Lansang vs. Gen. Garcia [GR L-33964, 11 December 1971]; (4) Chavez vs. Court of Appeals [GR L-29169, 19 August 1968]; (5) Gumabon vs. Director of the Bureau of Prisons [GR L-30026, 30 January 1971]; (6) In RE Petition for Habeas Corpus of Rolando Abadilla. Abadilla vs. Ramos [GR L-79173, 1 December 1987]; (7) Feria vs. Court of Appeals [GR 122954, 15 February 2000]; (8) Ilusorio vs. Bildner [GR 139789, 12 May 2000]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Freedom of Expression include the following cases: (1) United States vs. Bustos [GR L-12592, 8 March 1918]; (2) Burgos v. Chief of Staff, AFP [GR 64261, 26 December 1984]; (3) New York Times vs. Sullivan [376 US 254, 9 March 1964]; (4) In RE: Declaratory Relief RE Constitutionality of RA 4880. Gonzales vs. Commission on Elections [GR L-27833, 18 April 1969]; (5) Social Weather Stations Inc. vs. Commission on Elections [GR 147571, 5 May 2001]; (6) Zaldivar vs. Sandiganbayan [GR 79690-707, 1 February 1989]; (7) Sanidad vs. Commission on Elections [GR 90878, 29 January 1990]; (8) Janet Reno vs. Americal Civil Liberties Union [521 US 884,26 June 1997]; (9) Miriam College Foundation Inc. vs. Court of Appeals [GR 127930, 15 December 2000]; (10) Babst vs. National Intelligence Board [GR L-62992, 28 September 1984]; (11) Espuelas vs. People [GR L-2990, 17 December 1951]; (12) Lopez vs. Court of Appeals [GR L-26549, 31 July 1970]; (13) Quisumbing vs. Lopez [GR L-6465, 31 January 1955]; (14) Bulletin Publishing Corporation vs. Noel [GR 76565, November 1988]; (15) Texas vs. Johnson [491 US 397, 21 June 1989]; (16) Borjal vs. Court of Appeals [GR 126466, 14 January 1999]; (17) Bartnicki vs. Vopper [532 US 514, 21 May 2001]; (18) Cabansag vs. Fernandez [GR L-8974, 18 October 1957]; (19) People vs. Castelo [GR L-11816, 23 April 1962]; (20) People vs. Alarcon [GR 46551, 12 December 1939]; (21) Nestle Philippines vs. Sanchez [GR 75209, 30 September 1987]; (22) Primicias vs. Fugoso [GR L-1800, 27 January 1948]; (23) Navarro vs. Villegas [GR L-31687, 26 February 1970]; (24) Ignacio vs. Ela [GR L-6858, 31 May 1956]; (25) Reyes vs. Bagatsing [GR L-65366, 9 November 1983]; (26) Ruiz vs. Gordon [GR L-65695, 19 December 1983]; (27) Malabanan vs. Ramento [GR 62270, 21 May 1984]; (28) Arreza vs, Gregorio Araneta University Foundation [GR L-62297, 19 June 1985]; (29) German vs. Barangan [GR 68828, 27 March 1985]; (30) Acosta vs. Court of Appeals [GR 132088, 28 June 2000]; (31) Gonzales vs. Kalaw-Katigbak [GR L-69500, 22 July 1985]; (32) Lagunzad vs. Soto Vda. de Gonzales [GR L-32066, 6 August 1979]; (33) Ayer Production Pty. Ltd. vs. Capulong [GR L-82380, 29 April 1988]; (34) People vs. Kottinger [GR 20569, 29 October 1923]; (35) People vs. Go Pin [GR L-7491, 8 August 1955]; (36) Janet Reno vs. Americal Civil Liberties Union [521 US 884, 26 June 1997]; (37) Miller vs. California [413 US 15, 21 June 1973]; (38) Eastern Broadcasting Corporation vs. Dans [GR L-59329, 19 July 1985]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Freedom of Information include the following cases: (1) Baldoza vs. Dimaano [AM 1120-MJ, 5 May 1976]; (2) Tanada v. Tuvera [ GR L-63915, 29 December 1986]; (3) Valmonte vs. Belmonte [GR 74930, 13 February 1989]; (4) Legaspi vs. Civil Service Commission [GR 72119, 29 May 1987]; (5) Garcia vs. Board of Investments [GR 88637, 7 September 1989]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Freedom of Association include the following cases: (1) Occena vs. Commission on Elections [GR L-60258, 31 January 1984]; (2) In RE Edillon [AC 1928, 3 August 1978]; (3) Board of Directors of Rotary International vs. Rotary Club [481 US 537, 4 May 1987]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Freedom of Religion include the following cases: (1) Estrada vs. Escritor [AM P-02-1651, 4 August 2003]; (2)Islamic Da’wah Council of the Philippines vs. Office of the Executive Secretary [GR 153888, 9 July 2003]; (3)Epperson vs. Arkansas [393 US 97, 12 November 1968]; (4)Engel vs. Vitale [370 US 421, 25 June 1962]; (5)School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania vs. Schempp [374 US 203, 17 June 1963]; (6)Stone vs. Graham [449 US 39, 17 November 1980]; (7)Aglipay v. Ruiz [GR 45459, 13 March 1937]; (8)Mueller vs. Allen [463 US 388, 29 June 1983]; (9)Lemon vs. Kurtzman [403 US 602, 28 June 1971]; (10)Stone vs. Graham [449 US 39, 17 November 1980]; (11)Wallace vs. Jaffree [472 US 38, 4 June 1985]; (12)Fonacier vs. Court of Appeals [GR L-5917, 28 January 1955]; (13)West Virginia State Board of Education vs. Barnette [319 US 624, 14 June 1943]; (14)Ebralinag vs. Division Superintendent of Schools of Cebu [GR 95770, 1 March 1993]; (15)American Bible Society v. City of Manila [GR L-9637, 30 April 1957]; (16)Jimmy Swaggart Ministries vs. Board of Equalization of California [493 US 378, 17 January 1990]; (17)Victoriano vs. Elizalde Rope Workers’ Union [GR L-25246, 12 September 1974]; (18)Pamil vs. Teleron [GR L-34854, 20 November 1978]; (19)Torcaso vs. Watkins [367 US 488, 19 June 1961]

Narratives for Constitutional Law II-Liberty of Abode and Travel include the following cases: (1) Salonga vs. Hermoso [GR L-53622, 25 April 1980]; (2) Manotoc vs. Court of Appeals [GR L-62100, 30 May 1986]; (3) Marcos vs. Manglapus [GR 88211, 15 September 1989]; (4) Silverio vs. Court of Appeals [GR 94284, 8 April 1991]; (5) Lorenzo vs. Director of Health [GR 27484, 1 September 1927]

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s